Logo
  • Resources
    • COTS for Space WEBINARS
    • ACCEDE 2022 Workshop on COTS
    • EEE COMPONENTS
    • SPECIFICATIONS / QPLs
    • EVENTS / WEBINARS
    • SPACE TALKS
    • TECH ARTICLES
    • MANUFACTURERS NOTIFICATIONS
  • Laboratory Services
    • LABORATORY STANDARD TESTING
    • NON STANDARD TESTING
    • SILICON CARBIDE -SiC- DIODES
    • CROWDTESTING
    • OPTOELECTRONICS
    • SMALL SATS
    • REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS / PAPERS
  • Additional Services
    • INDUSTRY 4.0 CYBERSECURITY (IEC 62443)
    • PENETRATION TEST
    • CYBERSECURITY CERTIFIED (CSC)
    • CODE SCORE MATRIX
    • LONG-TERM STORAGE OF WAFERS
    • ELECTRONIC DESIGN
  • Tools
    • COMPARATOR
    • MY DCLs/BOMs
    • STOCKPLACE
  • About Us
  • My Request
  • Sign In
  • Resources
    • COTS for Space WEBINARS
    • ACCEDE 2022 Workshop on COTS
    • EEE COMPONENTS
    • SPECIFICATIONS / QPLs
    • EVENTS / WEBINARS
    • SPACE TALKS
    • TECH ARTICLES
    • MANUFACTURERS NOTIFICATIONS
  • Laboratory Services
    • LABORATORY STANDARD TESTING
    • NON STANDARD TESTING
    • SILICON CARBIDE -SiC- DIODES
    • CROWDTESTING
    • OPTOELECTRONICS
    • SMALL SATS
    • REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS / PAPERS
  • Additional Services
    • INDUSTRY 4.0 CYBERSECURITY (IEC 62443)
    • PENETRATION TEST
    • CYBERSECURITY CERTIFIED (CSC)
    • CODE SCORE MATRIX
    • LONG-TERM STORAGE OF WAFERS
    • ELECTRONIC DESIGN
  • Tools
    • COMPARATOR
    • MY DCLs/BOMs
    • STOCKPLACE
  • About Us
  • My Request
  • Sign In
Blog Image
INSPECTION, ELECTRICAL & VERIFICATION, TESTING

SAM Test methods: comparisons

  • Posted by Francisco Javier Aparicio Rebollo
  • On June 17, 2020
  • 0

Rejection criteria comparison

Criterion

Rejection threshold table

Crack extending from internal features

Portfolio

Void affecting a bond wire

Portfolio

rejection threreshold table

Portfolio
Portfolio
Portfolio

Rejection table

Rejection green

Rejection

Rejection last table

Temperature cycling

Additional testing: This deviation is considered as a reliability concern and additional tests must be conducted to check the system performance. From the point of view of the SAM inspection, such deviations do not comply with the acceptance criterion

Rejection ESCC 25200

Additional testing: This deviation is considered as reliability concerns and additional tests must be conducted to check the system performance. From the point of view of the SAM inspection, such deviations do not comply with the acceptance criterion

Conclusion

The most frequently observed issues are addressed by all the analyzed specifications. Nonetheless, there are remarkable differences such as:

  1. The rejection thresholds
  2. Only in some  methods additional tests and/or inspections are used to confirm suspected results and to further evaluate the actual impact on the systems performance, reliability and or durability

Conclusions

Read More about SAM Test Flow and Procedures

SAM: Test flow and procedures for the assessment of delamination flaws and historical results review
Our Internal procedure
Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Services
SAM: Main Issues in Plastic Encapsulated Systems
SAM: Survey to manufacturers and users
Our SAM Additional Testing Capabilities

Contact us

Communication to the Workshop on Electronics Materials & Processes for Space (EMPS-10)

Co-authors: David Ramírez-Cruzado Monge; Jose Cándido Vázquez, Dimas Morilla Mairen, Manuel Domínguez Álvarez, Antonio Rodríguez Arenas.

  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Francisco Javier Aparicio Rebollo
Francisco Javier Aparicio Rebollo
Degree in Physics and Ph.D. in Materials Science by the University of Seville.

Since 2007 Dr. Aparicio has developed a productive research career within the field of Materials Science including post-doctoral stays at the University of Trento, the University of Mons, and the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). His researches have been published in more than 30 articles in reputed international research journals and conferences (> 70) including more than 10 invited talks and lectures.

Within the frame of the program “Torres Quevedo” for the Knowledge Transfer and the incorporation of research talent into the industry, in 2019 he joined Alter Technology as Senior Materials Science Test Engineer. In 2019 he was appointed to lead the Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Service. Within this framework, he currently collaborates in different ESA projects (JUICE and PLATO).”

Actually, he is not in our company anymore, but still as an external collaborator in our blog.
Francisco Javier Aparicio Rebollo
Latest posts by Francisco Javier Aparicio Rebollo (see all)
  • Material Analysis Techniques for Electronic Components - May 6, 2022
  • SAM: Survey to manufacturers and users - February 17, 2022
  • What is a C-SAM Inspection? - January 29, 2022
TAGS: EEE PARTS C-SAM EEE PARTS DELAMINATION Testing Method

Previous Post

An Open Discussion On Metal Composite Power Inductors

Next Post

Scanning Acoustic Microscopy - Webinar
0 comments on SAM Test methods: comparisons
Recent Posts
  • New ECSS-Q-ST-60C Standards Explained- Discover
  • Accelerating Space Missions: Launch Faster with the ZSOM-F01 Rad-Tolerant SoM
  • Miniature RF Connectors
  • Miniature RF Connectors for high-performance testing
  • Space-Grade components available for immediate delivery
Scroll

doEEEt.com

DoEEEt: Electrical Electronic Electromechanical (EEE) parts database. Find (EEE) components/parts products and datasheets from hundreds of manufacturers.

Privacy Policy and Legal Notice

Copyright

Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2021 ALTER TECHNOLOGY TÜV NORD S.A.U

Company

About us

Contact us

How does doEEEt works? – FAQ

ALTER Laboratory Services

Microwave and RF Testing

Small Sats Testing

COTS components Testing

Authenticity Test